6 did: it removed the single functionality that provided a mechanical incentive. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. Abdulijubjub Field Marshal. There are many other strategy games where this is a very applicable concept, as there are penalties and downsides to growing bigger that can make your empire less. Totally viable. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. It made the rest of the game very easy, getting a quarter population boost and the large Gaia world, as well as a massive territory free for the taking. You could try to beat the Fallen. I would say your focus should instead be on securing defensible chokepoints against your neighbors and grabbing any important resources in your vicinity. I had 2 victories in approximately 360h of playtime. 2. others will catch up sooner or later. 1 rules, the best way to play Tall was to reduce the number of systems you controlled. Ascensions are cool. Fluffy-Tanuki Agrarian Idyll • 4 mo. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. 0 has brought massive changes to how buildings are acquired, how pops grow and how districts work. The 0,1 penalty is the +10% penalty per system other than the first one. Compare Stellaris. . Things have changed now, and playing tall is far from the powerhouse strategy it once was. Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. ”. Currently in 2. I too like to normally play wide, but I'll switch it up with a tall megacorp. the new plant trait of "budding" is pretty good in this scenario as the total size of planet will increase assembly speed but that does mean you can't build machines. 48. Generally, if you can have a large number of planets, there is little reason not to do so, since they will all develop more or less at the same pace. How to Manage Empire Size in Stellaris. Darvin3 • 2 yr. Step 1. I have two flavours playing stellaris, super nice super diplomatic empire or devouring swarm. Title says it all. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. In Stellaris people get a legit advice wide's always better and than come with screenshots of 90 planets, 900 pops asking why are they having problems. Terraforming to be 100% habitable for your pops. mining guilds is a lot better as the. Since your research requirements go up per each planet you colonize I find for me personally that it is better to only colonize larger worlds (15 tiles or more minimum). stellaris is a dynamic game, and rebellions and other events always change up the galaxy. This means any advice for "Tall" play needs to be tailored to the specific kind of run you're playing, which makes it kinda pointless to categorize them together. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. I was watching quill18's latest series on stellaris. 4 planets that are high ascension level and low empire sprawl is tall, since in current Stellaris, each planet is basically the equivalent to an entire city in a game like Civilization. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. . For example the governors, and the space station. That destroys federations) remove term limit. By mid- and certainly in the late game you should have a resource extraction planets feeding production and research planets. . For tall since you aren't conquering pops you MUST grow them. Weekly PSA: Habitat spam is the definition of playing wide. ago. The guaranteed strategic resources is helpful if you end up not having any in your corner of space (plus it gives higher chances of researching those techs for extraction). Here is what I have to report back: -This mod is very impressive and proves a greater challenge than Glavius mod by far. More systems=more stuff. 22 Badges. Unless something major crops up, the next Stellaris update is expected to be the 3. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. Sprawl exists but can be managed at any size. One last tip about resettling pops to take ruler jobs: with slaver guilds, you may have to resettle 3 pops total to fill 2 ruler jobs on a newly conquered planet. 8. 48. But in Stellaris it seems rather doubtful if you could play tall instead of wide. Thinking about playing stellaris is boring, I don't wanna open the game. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but people who play tall are "wrong". In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. Totally viable. are vassals just a prerequisite of playing tall. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. Darvin3 • 1 yr. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. 8 that I finally was able to bring into the current patch with the new planet mechanics. Nothing you do by restricting planets/ habitats offers you anything which you do not get when going wide. I would say going tall is even more viable now. Though I do think it will be similar to other gs games were playing wide is by far the best strategy and building tall is more something to do while waiting for the next war or something. 0 there is no difference between science going tall or wide. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I felt like I wasn't playing Stellaris, I felt like I was playing high elo StarCraft match. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. Tall really does not exist in Stellaris as you can be wide without expanding allot of territory. HopeFox • 6 yr. A 25k bastion requires 0 minerals per month. Hello, since the Galactic Comunity came out with Federations, I been trying to get towards the frists empires that have the most Diplomatic Weight, however, my playstle are mostly playing tall, with few sectors and planets on it, and with a 1000 Star and 25 empires, it seemed that wide empires tend to have more diplomatic weight because they. but I don't know how to get any resources any other way. Key ethic: Fanatic PacifistKey civic: Beacon of LibertyKey trait: Docile/Streamlined Protocols Key traditions: Dom. Subscribe to downloadChoices Matter: Tall vs. That’s 350x the population of China with much more area and a much more productive and advanced economy not just capable of building highways and skyscrapers, but advanced megastructures and entire artificial worlds. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. But I think there's another, even more key reason why Stellaris should enable tall play, ideally without diminishing other playstyles in the process: Stellaris has a goal to accommodate a variety of story experiences, and to let the player enact a variety of classic sci-fi tropes. First things first, let's talk definitions - I describe 'going tall' in Stellaris as simply restricting oneself to never having sectors. Habitats are incredibly bad now. First things first; your ethics should be materialist. OPS is an excruciatingly tall play-style, but I do promise you'll pick up interchangeable skills that'll enhance your tall play. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. 0 ruleset that was revised in 3. In just one year, that's 3600 minerals conserved. Enjoy your stratified society. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. 2) Optimize Production Methods edict An edict with a base cost of 300 influence and a base duration of 10 years that increases resources from jobs by 50%. It’s not a case of habitats being bad for robots, it’s more that their 100% habitability on all planets goes against the tall playstyle. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather. In a perfect run you would just grow large nough to start the vassalisation chain and then even shrink yourself a bit if over 100. How can I play tall, and how good are my chances of being to defend against a large chunk of the galaxy? I have a 10k star fortress with 12 platforms and my entire fleet parked in the hyper lane entrance to my systems. Other good tradition trees for Void Dwellers include Domination (more influence and housing), Prosperity (more minerals, more specialist output, another building slot). Any void dwellers build with militarist. Thus, this guide is divided into three parts. My favorite is fanatic militarist/authoritarian with Stratified Economy but no slavery. Conventional wisdom is that playing wide is easier than playing tall, but my experience has been the opposite. 7. Tall gameplay does not exist in Stellaris. Though to be honest, it doesn't really change my strategy in Stellaris all that much. the best ways to play tall are either: a trade empire (megacorp would be the best) because the best planet types (ecumenopolis/ring world) are the best for generating trade and trade does fully cover energy, consumer goods and unity production. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. Report. Stack research until you burst, playing tall without Megacorp or Inward Perfection is tricky, and the problem is that going wide will almost always work out better for you, even with DLC. In Civ 5, taking tradition and limiting yourself to 4 cities for most of the game typically means your cities will grow much faster than if you play wide. Turn a planet into an ecumenopolis and set them to work on whatever you need (alloys, unity, consumer goods) or research ring/relic world. There is no tall game-play in Stellaris, in the sense of having a very few or small number of super planets vs. "Tall" in Stellaris isn't doing more with less, it's just having less. for civics, mechanist is pretty good, syncretic evolution is great too, technocracy is ideal. Over the course of time, that planet will grow and become very valuable and the energy cost to setup a branch office will pay for itself, many times over. If you rely on the bastion for defense for the latter half of the. [deleted] • 3 yr. Conquest is better, but vassals are fun for role playing. #12. Playstyles are how a player plans to tackle playing or even winning the game. The only playstyle I do not enjoy is playing with vassals, because I do not fully understand how to make that work and the little bits I do understand just make it seem rather bland. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. Versus AI its possible to play tall but its harder than wide. You need to go wide to get more resources and fund a larger army. This is in part due to victory conditions which allow a "tall" strategy to work throughout the game, but also because you can leverage your "tall" advantages into a temporary tech advantage at the right times to break out as a large conqueror -- you don't need to. Stellaris is a game I fall in and out of love with every few months and one of this games biggest flaws and probably what stops me from playing it regularly is having to micromanage 50+ planets every few minutes to build homes and create jobs. Jun 27, 2017;. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. This guide is incredible. On the plus side, we get more unity faster without explicitly focusing it. Wide. Alternatively, you can use automation, which is actually pretty easy and works well enough for most people. imo, ethics, materialist research speed bonus is great, and robots are an extra source of pops, so it is excellent. It's a playstyle meant for defense and not offense. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. Currently it's 2460, there are 39 empires, I'm the permanent Galactic Custodian. If you play tall right, you can get more than 15000 tech per month mid game. 3. A Tall play now isnt about just being small, it is about being efficient. Tall strategies focus on having a few cities packed into smaller territory but much more heavily upgraded. Introduced with the title's Utopia expansion, habitats act as a tool that enables playing tall. Tall is restricting yourself to playing with fewer colonies and avoiding outward expansion. If you don't have to fight anyone for that space, it's free space, take it. In practice this means you build Habitats, Ring-Worlds, Dyson Sphere and Science Nexus. large number of poorly developed planets. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of how to play a Tall empire. ;-) Most of the wide drawbacks come in the form of population. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. Way, Way, WAAAY Too Many Thoughts on Necrophage (Strategy, Synergy, etc. The other main reason is that pure machine empires only rely on energy for unity and research production, which makes playing tall weaker than wide since you won’t have as many planets to turn into pure energy worlds, meaning less specialization meaning less production-per-pop. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. While Tall empires aren’t currently competitively viable, there are some features that lean towards a tall playstyle, and can be used as starters, points for praise, or references for further development. The angler build is still a solid choice. e. Stellaris Tall vs Wide, which is better? Wide, the answer is wide. Absolutely insane for a research capital and tall empire. r/Stellaris. You stick to yourself, and they like it. 3 is a bad idea. In Stellaris tall is an RP/aesthetic/laziness based preference, not a strategy for optimizing a win, for all the reasons people have posted. I always run into economic defects, Overpopulation and being serounded by larger empire's. Ideally you would want to begin a period of rapid expansion towards the end of filling out this tree. On easy difficulties though, wide is better than tall most of the time. Enjoy your stratified society. In some updates, it was a very effective strategy to get ahead technologically and get early ascensions - it's much less the case now. Are you using the -dx11 option and borderless window, because trust me Stellaris is NOT single threaded, there was a dev blog post specifically discussing this in the past. Its the eternal question that decides how you’re going to play your game of stellaris and what you early strategy is going to be. You will be slightly less ahead, as the AI here is much better at tech, but still a massive lead. In Stellaris the game naturally flows for you to be playing Wide and the only way to play tall is by stacking habitats and/or ringworlds in your territory to make up for the lack of actual habitable planets you may find yourself with. This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console Edition, full of tips and tricks and gameplay to show you How to Build a Tall Empire and Play as One. HopeFox • 6 yr. That's not the definition of Wide or Tall as per Stellaris, the actual game. At the very beginning of the game you can get some pretty good growth by putting your homeworld into capacity bonus territory, but as your empire-wide population grows the pop growth penalty just gets bigger and bigger. Empire strategy that minimizes empire size. And in a game about choice the choice to play Tall or Wide should actually matter. Step 2: pretend that you wanted to be small and ineffective in the first place. I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2. There is also the older mechanics such as increased tech cost per planet and ethics divergence by distance which will favour building tall. 3. While I do know some general aspects of playing tall and I also know that in 2. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of. The 0,1 penalty is the +10% penalty per system other than the first one. That is, you stay small for some time so you can: - focus on science. I keep seeing stuff around the internet about 2. 3; 1; 1; Reactions:. In reality it would be just the same wide play, just with fewer systems. 3 a LOT. Also, I have never played with catalytic treatment. ago. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. Origin varies but Gaia, voidborn and the ever broken ring world start works well. Victoria 2 was released 12 years ago, and victoria 3 is set to be released this year. But what exac. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. Unyielding lets you support more Starbases, which means more room for Hydroponics buildings, which means more food without needing to devote pops to producing it. Its more a general approach to stay small and go for quality or quantity. r/Stellaris • Tall vs Wide is really an issue with a Unity not being competetive with Science. ago. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. While habitats are good, it’s probably better to be funding colony ships. Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. "Playing tall" in Stellaris is always purely a roleplaying decision. Your ability to make long term decisions is tied to Influence. We will use these. Tall isn't viable nothing in the beta makes tall viable. Internal struggles. I can also use influence to grow taller by activating an edict, making my. It is viable to for example use diplomacy and just build shit loads of habitats to grow populations and form alliances and federations and mostly invade to create new versions of your own empire and include them in your federations. I prefer to use my custom made tall chair and pc table to play tall. Sadly, space gnomes have not been confirmed, so we'll probably be forced to play tall. So in Stellaris this would probably be a habitat/megastructure heavy playstyle and trying to do things that give you extra districts on your planets. There is the playing tall strategy. For tall, your best bet is a megacorp. Technocracy is amazing for more research gains. 5. 3 comments. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. Those people are wrong, as are you. This mod creates a new trait that will allows both Human and AI to play “play tall”. Meaning it was a lot easier to out-tech wide empires. . Base habitat, with the size modifier, will have maybe half population growth from size penalties. r/Stellaris. I then played UNE (completely normal peace loving federation builders), and a fairly decent sized starting empire worked, we even colonised a couple systems. Originally posted by twistedmelon: Tall is still a strategy, but it is more grey. They now cost twice as much and are roughly half as effective as they used to be. Playing tall is a long-term strategy, so players should generally start using it. Get a migration treaty immediately so you can get access to other species. I was playing stellaris and got bored of losing, so made a perfect species, necrophage, demigods. The bonus of it is you can probably defend your entire space with one fleet. Stellaris. 7. Given that EUIV’s features aren’t currently available in Stellaris, the. r/Stellaris A chip A chipOne of the greatest concepts added to EU4 was the wide vs. I actually don't particularly dislike this change, but this was how I got. But the real mechanic at play with Tall vs. I've always preferred playing tall in 4x games and was wondering if there is any effective strategy for playing tall in this game. r/Stellaris • How does playing tall work?Stellaris Tall vs Wide is total number of colonies / habitats in general. Toggle signature. Tall is more chill and easier. for many many hours straight. I think it would be cool if there was a terraformable slider. Another thing is the deep space stuff, and the auto-resettle building. Ecumenopolis helps immensly, as does subjugating half the galaxy for the energy credits. Created by Robinicus. Wide strategies focus on having lots of cities and territory, often with each city having minimal upgrades. Small. Currently bigger empires (ie conquest) is just stronger due to the fact that you can just increase your empire sprawl endlessly (ie no science loss from bigger empires) and the ai has weird ship designs and uses buildings suboptimally. By Obsidian Shadow. Any void dwellers build with militarist. . Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. In fact it could be easier with more resources. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. Stellaris players aren't at all happy with the AI habitat spam that plagues their games and have rallied yet again, begging Paradox to address the grand strategy game's long-running issue. Top 1% Rank by size. Grand Admirals cannot stop you. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits How to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it a shot. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. ago. A big part of the goals behind this update is to also make the “tall” playstyle a viable option again. 2 and before) because a wide and a "tall" empires will grow at the same rate, to about the same cap, with only some minor buffs for "tall" like mastery of nature that don't even come into play until later. That's not surprising, since the whole goal of the game is to expand as much and as quickly as possible, but it also means you're basically free to do whatever you want!. You can do this by either vassalizing or stacking minus empire size modifiers. But wide in Stellaris doesnt require any more work to maintain and keep stable, so its hard to ever make Tall the more viable option without changes that just make playing wide miserable. Diogenes_of_Sparta Specialist • 2 yr. I won by playing a Megacorp. Third is that people will want a Bulwark, but probabably as a 1-planet minor vassal, in order to get significant starbase discounts (20%) that will also apply to planetary rings. I never played a Tall game before and usually rarely peaceful lol But sounds like a lot fun. Pacifism also allows the player to pick an exceptionally powerful Civic, Inward Perfection. Some used up to 14. While playing tall was pretty much building a lot of frontier outposts and having at most 3-4 planets. If you want you can call this "its dead", but as long some people write a guide, there is a way to play tall. This reduces the number of different buildings you expect to build on each planet. But i definitely struggle when it comes to playing a more aggressive empire like the Commonwealth of Man or the Determined Exterminators. These changes will force players to decide whether to focus on fully developing what little. Stellaris has no such restrictions, in fact it’s the opposite; there are almost no consequences for conquering other empires early, you even have choices depending on your situation, and early conquests allow you to conquer even more mid to late game. . . I would however definitely recommend getting Utopia as soon as you can though, the sheer volume of content across all game phases. Expansion: After Discovery comes a period of rapid expansion. Ascendant clones get crazy huge specialist bonuses, so what you want to do is pack them into forge and factory worlds. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. Also without guaranteed worlds if your unlucky you're forced to go to war or go tall. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. . The stations, planets and habitats are improvements of that sector. Generally, if you can have a large number of planets, there is little reason not to do so, since they will all develop more or less at the same pace. Okay, first things first, if you PLAN to play tall go for the pacifist build and just switch out later on. Tall vs Wide is now about unity. 3 and my solutions for it. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. Even “playing tall” can benefit from this pick early since 30 administrative capacity is nothing and the +20 essentially translates into faster research and tradition. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. However, I am interested in playing tall, since maybe this is the best strategy for me. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. Fast Breeders - This perk give +25% growth. Tall/Wide are CIV terms that the community stole and then tried to apply them to this game and completely screwed everything up. Wide involves expanding as much as possible and colonizing as many planets as possible. Then tried a mixed economy run aimed at going tall and setting up strong vassals but was stymied when I realized 3 planets in 28 systems was incredibly unlucky and having anamoly researchers was actually. Stellaris has no such restrictions, in fact it’s the opposite; there are almost no consequences for conquering other empires early, you even have choices depending on your situation, and early conquests allow you to conquer even more mid to late game. the tech tree ends at some point and the. Assuming you play 2. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!! Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Welcome to the patricians way to play Stellaris. . Playing tall finally is viable and I don't feel forced to expand non-stop without trade-offs. It doesn't stop people from trying to shoe-horn it into Stellaris, but it. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. Make sure to grab voidborn and fill the habitats with energy pops and use the merchant enclaves to grab minerals. That depends on what you mean by playing tall. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. In Stellaris I can use my influence to grow wider by building starbases or settling colonies. Hello my most pious followers. NB: this is system not planet. 9 (2. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. In summary, make tall viable by requiring wide play to require major investment that requires opportunity cost, while giving the player satisfying tall alternatives (infrastructure/tech investment) that simultaneously provide for a more satisfying strategic layer and decision making experience. All strategies assume you are trying to get maximum pops & maximum jobs on every planet. Low empire size penalties mean that; your empire will be researching and unlocking traditions faster than your neighbors. Ethics, Civics, Traditions and other choices strongly support or hinder certain Playstyles. 0 anglers got stronger. The current raiding playstyle (whether from civic or ascension perk) is worthless. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. If you want to be able to play Tall, play Endless Legend. 1. The benefits of playing tall are as follows: Smaller empires are easier to manage. Void Dwelling Megacorp is strong but unless you can balance the Influence (Not as bad now but still tight) and alloys early game. 23. And my understanding of it (as of everything else) shifts a bit all the time, so. Traits wise, probably grab the usual Deviant Unruly Intelligent Natural Engineer combination. As I understand, the point is to focus on research and traditions and less so on economy, but I'm trying a tall run now and it feels like everything's sorta slow since my research speed is at 10, 7. 2 or 1. | Paradox Interactive Forums. RodHull (Banned) Apr 22, 2021 @ 2. It is a very rough start. You can also do this as a machine intelligence but its entirely a different strategy. Tall vs Wide. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Yes, even when playing wide you still try to play as tall as possible but you first focus on expansion. The problem is that it wasn't obvious because of. We recommend you to use them whenever you play the game. It has factiond designed for playing tall. . Very high output per system for when your packed in. I think the whole tall vs wide dichotomy is dumb. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. ago. There's wide and then there's wider. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. ago A common misunderstanding is that playing tall means having a small number of systems. Wide and Tall isn’t a stellaris definition, it’s used in many strategy games. You. There is still no better or more successful way to play the game than tech rush, expand like a virus and maxing out your fleet. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. Going tall is a meme. I've done a lot of spreadsheeting and playtesting on tech-focus builds, and I'm of the opinion that your ideal mid-game size is 20-30 planets, which no one. Wide empires have more pops. You can rightfully play this by ONLY claiming systems with huge planets with lots of room for research and skipping over systems with. 2. Expand at all costs! Wide in general, less-wide if you intend to do an early war of conquest. A Void Dweller run will play completely differently from a Nihilistic Acquisition raider run, which will play completely differently from a one-planet-challenge run. Some used one planet. When I look at some people's screenshots here, I see that some have naval caps in the 300's and 400's at the same time as I'm playing (early 24th century). Just, because something is. ago. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. The S Tier only features the best of the best Origin available in Stellaris. walter. the main contributor to a viable tall play Megacorp's are Stellaris "tall" playstyle. I play tall and use tributaries. Technology_Training • 3 mo.